Posts: 19
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation:
0
In my opinion Chrome and Chromium should not be lumped together, especially in polls targeting Linux and other free software users, because some may specifically prefer Chromium over Chrome due to licensing and software freedom issues. Others might prefer Chrome because it has more features (such as Netflix capability) and tighter integration to the Googleverse. Regardless of the merits of either side of the case, the point here is that if you're polling people over which browser they use, you should make distinct browsers distinct.
Posts: 17
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation:
0
I am sad to see Opera with only 4%. Opera has always led the pack with new features and innovation. And if you have a question or comment they actually respond. Try that with Google.
All the browsers are memory suckers these days. (At least on the Windows side). I am running LL under VirtualBox right now. Virtualbox is costing 98meg. Nothing! One tab on Opera is 177 meg and one tab on Chrome is 149meg. And I like to keep about 5-15 or more tabs open in Opera and usually a few in Chrome. Adds up,but I don't sweat it with 16 Gig.
Firefox was a sweet,fast browser when they first started,but became to bloated and the addons screwed me one too many times. I would depend on a bunch of addons and then FF would upgrade from ver 2.0.2.05 to ver 2.0.2.06 because someone misspelled a word in the EULA and all of my addons wouldn't work! It could take days to never to get them to work again. Luckily Opera came on the scene and now FF is used occasionally.
BTW,thanks for the post. Interesting.
Posts: 228
Threads: 15
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
Firefox has seen better days, I agree. 10 years ago when I started with FF 2.0, it was quick compared to IE 6 & IE 7 of the day. Now though, it's kinda lost its way. I used to use Pale Moon, which is a lighter, forked unbloated FF. That project is still around I believe, if anyone is interested. It's better than FF in a lot of ways. Hell, even SeaMonkey is less bloated than Firefox, and SeaMonkey has Email, IRC and more features built-in, kinda like Opera used to be in the Presto layout engine.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Theodore,
![[Image: ha6sMdA.png]](http://i.imgur.com/ha6sMdA.png)
HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11-e015dx (11-inch "Travelbook")
ASUS Republic Of Gamers G752VT-DH74 (17-inch Main) [6GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M GPU, 24GB RAM]
Posts: 93
Threads: 8
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation:
0
I think it is "horses for courses". Firefox is fine for me on my most powerful machine, but on an old netbook which runs LL 2.8 easily it gobbles up memory to an extent that it freezes the system.
On that Slimjet and Midori are better for simple admin tasks.
I have Chromium on all of them.
Posts: 22
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
0
always been a fan of firefox, since a few months also using PaleMoon
Posts: 94
Threads: 15
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
0
used Firefox at first, after updating to 64 bit back to Chrome.
changed from Windows 10 to a REAL OS
Posts: 108
Threads: 12
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
0
Heavily tweeked FF as my go-to browser, because it's so easy to set it to my liking. Chromium for videos.
LL6.6 in VM
LL5.8 Host
Posts: 316
Threads: 49
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
I've used Slimjet for two years now, and consider it to be the best browser available. But it doesn't do .mp4's on Linux due to licensing, so I've now switched to Vivaldi, which isn't far behind SJ and is coming on strong.