Posts: 8,908
Threads: 546
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
5
With the prevalence of Social Media in the world, should we for convenience, include Social Media applications in Lite Software?
I know some of you are anti-social media, and that will influence your opinion. We are trying to push the message of free software. I'm not a big fan myself, but I'm always able to see the bigger picture and put aside personal opinion.
"You can use your enemies own weapons to defeat them..."
I don't want to see Social Media applications at any form in Linux Lite. I want it simple and reliable, it seems better if someone needs it can downloads it.
penglezos
Posts: 508
Threads: 55
Joined: Jan 2015
(05-12-2017, 09:57 AM)penglezos link Wrote: I don't want to see Social Media applications at any form in Linux Lite. I want it simple and reliable, it seems better if someone needs it can downloads it.
penglezos
Ditto
Posts: 159
Threads: 16
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
0
I simply don't see the need for these applications. The websites are fine.
If any maybe something like Franz (I don't know how "free" that one is) to have one program that combines the various social media platforms.
Linux Lite 5.0 on Lenovo Edge 540 <3
Posts: 682
Threads: 98
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
0
(05-12-2017, 10:41 AM)Jocklad link Wrote: [quote author=penglezos link=topic=4199.msg31960#msg31960 date=1494583069]
I don't want to see Social Media applications at any form in Linux Lite. I want it simple and reliable, it seems better if someone needs it can downloads it.
penglezos
Ditto

[/quote]
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu 4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop 2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit
Posts: 182
Threads: 29
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation:
0
Disclaimer: I am anti-social media. OK, now onward. If it's in Lite software as an optional item. No problem. You have a 'Social Media' add-on in Lite Software. You tick it, hit enter. A GUI pops open & you select what you want, and it installs. I'm good with that. Additional, optional add-on's in Lite Software, or the repository hurt no one. However, if it was up to me I'd have items that are installed in Linux Lite right now moved to 'Lite Software'. To me the perfect Linux Lite is a strong, solid, secure OS that you add things to AFTER installation. Not try to figure out how to get rid of things you'll never use. A thought for down the road is to add another option to the 'welcome' screen after a fresh install. It would say "Would you like to look at a list of additional software you can add to Linux Lite?". Works for me.
Posts: 8,908
Threads: 546
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
5
Ottawagrant nailed it. It's there but it doesn't affect you. I don't need personal feelings on this matter, I need to know if this is something the masses would use or find useful.
Posts: 682
Threads: 98
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
0
05-12-2017, 01:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2017, 01:04 PM by newtusmaximus.)
I agree with Ottawagrant re slimming down LL and making Lite Software option larger. As the Kernel grows with the LL uniqueness of backwards hardware compatibility, the ISO is getting progressively larger. . I am not sure what % is Kernel and what % is "addons - ( included software). Personally I still feel the iso should be capable of fitting on a CD with basic browser to tide users over - and the path for further addons , once LL installed, then made clear. FWIW
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu 4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop 2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit